What’s All The Discussion About…PDM?

Last week I discussed whether or not our company needed to implement some sort of a PDM tool in a blog post titled “PDM…Do We Need It?” Since I did this post I have noticed a lot of discussion on other blogs and a lot of comments on my own blog about PDM software and implementation. This is a tool that I never heard too much about other than on Devon Sowell’s blog PDM Solutions. I knew it existed but it never seemed to receive too much discussion in the SolidWorks community. This is a very intriguing tool and seems to have caught the attention of a lot of users out there.

One comment on my blog that instantly caught my attention was from Pete Yodis. His comment was as follows:

“I’d be asking SolidWorks some questions about their plans for WorkGroup. There is nothing listed for being new in 2009 and not much mention of the product on their new website. It begs the question, what’s the future hold for the product? As someone who setup, maintains, and administers my company’s WorkGroup vault that now contains 12,300 unique file names and 33,000 unique document revisions it is something that I would like to know. What’s the plan SolidWorks, and why no information? Some speculate that it will eventually be Enterprise Lite, but I’d rather know the plans and not speculate. I’d like to know what’s happening with the product that houses the 10s of thousands of files we have in there.”

This comment made me a little curious as to what was going on and I wanted to figure out what the future holds for PDMWorks WorkGroup before I invested my time and efforts into something that would not be available in a year. I emailed an employee at SolidWorks that I know and I quickly received a phone call from him letting me know what he knew about the situation. This is what I was told. This year as Pete mentioned there were not very many enhancements made to PDMWorks WorkGroup, this is not because they are going to discontinue it but because they are focusing on PDMWorks Enterprise which is their flagship software for PDM management. I understand this completely, as a company why would you invest time and money into a free tool that you package with your software when you can be spending the same time and money on making your add on flagship product even better. It makes perfect sense to me now. Not saying that I like it, but I understand. As a company that only has 3-4 designers it is not worth it for us right now to use a product like PDMWorks Enterprise but instead we can use what is available to us with a product like WorkGroup. I was also told that PDMWorks WorkGroup will still be supported like it always has been but you just won’t see the enhancements that you have in the past. As for Pete, I hopes this answers your questions and can ease your anxiety over all of your models in WorkGroup.

What does all of this mean for myself at the company that I work at? Well, add it to the list of CAD Administration things that I need to implement. The list is growing rapidly so I will need to see when I get to it. I guess prioritizing my list is not too far off in the distance and I see this implementation being towards the top of the list.

Earlier I mentioned that I have seen a lot about PDM lately in the SolidWorks community. Check out these links to see what others are saying about it.

Devon Sowell - 2009 WorkGroup PDM In 11 Steps (a must see for anyone looking to implement this in the near future)

Lenny Kikstra - Evaluating PDM Software

Lenny Kikstra - PDM In Plain English

Also, check out the comments from my post “PDM…Do We Need It?”


Be the first to like this post.

4 Responses to What’s All The Discussion About…PDM?

  1. Devon T. Sowell says:

    Hello Jason-

    During the past 18 months or so, many companies have come to realize the importance of Product Data Management. For users with SolidWorks Professional and Premium, SolidWorks has made it very easy to try WorkGroup PDM.

    In my opinion, WorkGroup PDM will be supported by SolidWorks for many years into the future.

    Great post, Jason.

    Devon T. Sowell

  2. Pete Yodis says:

    Jason,

    Thanks for the post on this topic. I would like to know then, what did my subscription money for PDMWorks Advanced Server go to? I just payed $1,500 for the year and basically the response is… we will continue to support the product. What? What is my $1,500 doing? If they are not making any improvements, then why the $1,500 charge? At the least this subscription fee should drop significantly. We are not getting what we are paying for.

    Pete

  3. Colin Fitzpatrick says:

    Pete,
    Excellent point! I’ve submitted several enhancement requests for Workgroup over the last year (good ones too!) and heard boo back from SW corporation. How can you ignore a product like Workgroup, and focus on a product that’s newer and no one can afford? Workgroup has been around for years and can tell you there are more Workgroup users vs. Enterprise users. I cannot believe SW is ignoring this.

    Colin

  4. Jason says:

    Hey there Colin and Pete,

    I am speaking for myself here and not for any SolidWorks employees but I would imagine that there are probably a few enhancements still to Workgroup at every release but just are not getting the press that their flagship Enterprise gets.

    I also would say that the full support is going to continue which is probably where some of the money goes but I agree that $1,500 does sound high. However, that is for the Advanced Server and not just the plain PDMWorks WorkGroup.

    I am personally going to implement WorkGroup at my company will full confidence that I will get any support that I need.

    Thanks for commenting again guys, it is people like you that keep me going with this blog.

    Jason

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>